Carson Tanguilig vs India Houghton Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Oct at 04:22 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Tanguilig vs I. Houghton

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Tanguilig 1 - 0 Houghton
They have played 2 sets in total, with Carson Tanguilig winning 2 and India Houghton winning 0. The last match between Carson Tanguilig and India Houghton was at the W15 Sumter, 30-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Carson Tanguilig getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tanguilig | 1 |
| Houghton | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Sumter(10-30-25)
C. Tanguilig vs I. Houghton H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 62.16% (23-14) | Career Total W/L | 64.41% (38-21) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Tanguilig vs I. Houghton Match Preview:
- Recent form in second serve points shows Carson Tanguilig as a stronger performer, winning 39.50% compared to India Houghton's 13.33%. Does this give Tanguilig a significant edge? Likely yes.
- In return game stats, Tanguilig leads by winning 52.61% of second serve return points versus Houghton's 47.62%. However, Houghton performs slightly better in first serve returns with 35.71%, edging Tanguilig's 32.83%.
- Under pressure, Houghton is marginally better at saving breakpoints, with a 46.15% success rate, compared to Tanguilig's 39.44%.
- Comparing match wins in the past year, Tanguilig boasts a 66.67% win rate, overshadowing Houghton's 53.85%.
- Both players excel on clay with identical win percentages of 69%, but Tanguilig struggles more on hard courts with a 40% win rate, while Houghton stands at 64%.
- In terms of tournament level, Tanguilig has dominated the $10K circuit with a 77.78% win rate, whereas Houghton has maintained a 53.85% win ratio.
- Opponent quality highlights Tanguilig's experience against stronger opponents, with an average rank of 200.42, compared to Houghton's 268.15.
- In deciding sets, Houghton maintains a perfect record, winning all matches, whereas Tanguilig has won 67%.
Editorial Prediction (October 30, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance, Carson Tanguilig shows a clear advantage in second serve points and has demonstrated superior return game stats. Such aspects are critical determinants in match outcomes, especially when tightly contested.
While India Houghton exhibits resilience under pressure and has an impeccable record in deciding sets, Tanguilig's stronger overall win percentage and experience against higher-ranked opponents point towards her being the more formidable player.
Though surface preference aligns similarly for both competitors on clay, the distinct difference on hard courts could be a deciding factor. Additionally, Tanguilig's dominance in the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments strengthens her case as a favorite.
Considering the combination of factors, especially Tanguilig's standout performances in key statistics, Carson Tanguilig is most likely to win this upcoming tennis match.
Carson Tanguilig vs India Houghton Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Tanguilig vs I. Houghton H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:35:21 | Average Match Time | 1:35:21 |
| 73% (27/37) | 1st Serve % | 75% (63/84) |
| 89% (24/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (33/63) |
| 40% (4/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (8/21) |
| 31% (4/13) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 51% (43/84) | Return Points Win % | 24% (9/37) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Tanguilig Recent Matches Played
I. Houghton Recent Matches Played

C. Tanguilig vs I. Houghton Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.16% (23/14) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.41% (38/21) |
| 60.98% (50/32) | Sets Win/Loss | 63.08% (82/48) |
| 54.87% (417/343) | Games Win/Loss | 56.18% (677/528) |
| 53.85% (7/6) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.29% (27/15) |
| 66.67% (16/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 64.29% (9/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 50 | Aces Total | 61 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 77 | Total Double Faults | 68 |
| 1:6:46 | Average Match Time | 1:33:31 |
| 286.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 114.8 |
| 65% (1010/1543) | 1st Serve % | 69% (2204/3177) |
| 66% (664/1010) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (1342/2204) |
| 44% (236/533) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (462/973) |
| 45% (82/181) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (207/429) |
| 44% (704/1598) | Return Points Win % | 47% (1523/3207) |
| 38.46% (5/8) | Challenger W/L | 53.85% (7/6) |
| 75.00% (18/6) | Futures W/L | 67.39% (31/15) |
| 62% (23/37) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (38/59) |
| 73% (8/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (9/15) |
| 50% (4/8) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (6/12) |
| 87% (23/20) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 97% (37/36) |
| 13% (23/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 3% (37/1) |
| 21% (14/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (22/2) |